May 29, 2011
"

It has always had special meaning for me because I read it when I was young – 18 or so. It resonated with my fantasies about Manhattan, the Upper East Side and New York City in general.

It was such a relief from the other books I was reading at the time, which all had a quality of homework to them. Reading The Catcher in the Rye was pure pleasure. The burden of entertainment is on the author. Salinger fulfils that obligation from the first sentence on.

Reading and pleasure didn’t go together for me when I was younger. Reading was something you did for school, out of obligation. It was something you did if you wanted to take out a certain kind of woman. It wasn’t something I did for fun. But The Catcher in the Rye was different. It was amusing, it was in my vernacular, and the atmosphere held great emotional resonance for me.

"

Woody Allen on J.D. Salinger (via mollylambert)

  1. outofthelightning reblogged this from mollylambert
  2. doinky reblogged this from rach
  3. missdelphine reblogged this from rach
  4. rach reblogged this from mollylambert
  5. letusreadandletusdance reblogged this from mollylambert
  6. silver-lined-city reblogged this from mollylambert
  7. estereorradian reblogged this from mollylambert
  8. trilladamclark reblogged this from mollylambert
  9. precipise reblogged this from mollylambert
  10. littlejoeii reblogged this from mollylambert
  11. dillpicks reblogged this from mollylambert
  12. iwanttobelikearollingstone reblogged this from mollylambert
  13. stellaramar reblogged this from mollylambert
  14. mollylambert posted this